Marxism Analysis of The Lower Depths Essay Example for Free

Marxism Analysis of The Lower Depths EssayMaxim Gorkys The Lower Depths shows the struggle between sortes. Unquestionably, its concentrate on is on the low-downest of the frugal each(prenominal)y low class masses being controlled by the bourgeoisie. It is besides a representation of how cruel the society could be towards them and how, in turn, the people are affected by the society. Although the blowout talks of the story of low class people the vagrant, the gambler, the ex-artist, the ex-aristocrat, the prostitute, and so adult maley others, the thiefs display case is the best to display the struggle between the classes. Thieves are likely to be wicked, troublesome, and disobedient. However, the thief in the text projects only the wickedness and troublesomeness but is not re on the wholey disobedient. He is a bit subservient to the whims of their landlady. Though it is true that there are times when he doesnt want to follow what the char says, in the end the woman wou ld always find a way to make him do some(prenominal) she likes. For instance, when the landlady wanted the thief to kill her husband, the thief refused. And to bring her plans into reality, she beats Natasha whom the thief cared about.This made the thief angry and he went to confront the landlady but he incident totallyy killed her husband instead. Aside from this, the fact that the landlady owned her infant Natasha made the thief adhere to her caprice. He is always protecting his love and is willing to do everything to redundant her from the landlord and the landladys injustice. The text embodies how the low class people resist the ideology of those in the higher classes. However, because of caboodle they are in, they end up going along with whatever those in higher classes demands.The lower economic groups are ignored in this text by those higher than them. The mere title of the play is distasteful. The propose where the characters live is created and tagged as the lower dep ths by no other than the society itself. This just inwardness that the society is also the primary reason for the repression experienced by the people. What the society didnt realize is that these low class people are in the lower depths because they are deprived of chances to attain their goals and they are cast off on circumstances that destroy their self-confidence.The system of the ruling class caused the alienation of the low class people, thence causing them not to be able to live their lives to the fullest. Also, the setting is where the characters tell their stories and debate on whether it is intermit to live without illusions on cardinals own capability or to embrace a romanticized view of the world in order to protect oneself from the pain of daily life. In the play, it is the character of Luka who seems to idealize everything in life and the one who demonstrate that philosophy is meant to be used as an instrument to initiate change.Precisely, it was him who played t he opposing go through to the rest of the characters. He is an example of an old man whom experiences made wise. He serves as an inspiration to everyone he meets by urging each of them to start a new life. In spite of this, his extreme optimism could also be the same reason why his life failed. And although he amazed the neglected lower class people in the lower depths, his arrival in their lives was too late that their energy and will has already taken from them. No matter how those people try to ascend from the social swamp, they are always shoved confirm into the depths.For example, when Natasha and the thief were about to begin a new life, destiny surpass them. Natasha was terribly beaten by her sister and when the thief came to confront the landlady, he accidentally killed the landlord. The theme of the play could be about the laterality of the higher class over the lower classes. As one of the plays characters puts it And so for all the others. Locksmiths then bootmakers a nd other working folk and all the agriculturals and even the gentry they live for the better manEach thinks es livin fer imself, yet it turns out its fer that better man. All of them who live in the depths and all the other workers seem to believe that they are accompaniment for themselves. What they dont realize is that they are living to work and feed the bourgeoisie. And aside from this, the fact that the characters came from different field means that the bourgeoisie could control all aspects of the culture. To sum up, the play is a depiction of how the bourgeoisie rule the society. And the fact that the society puts the label to people shows how powerful it could affect other peoples lives.